🔗 Share this article

One of some of the most recognizable pictures from the 20th century shows a nude girl, her arms spread wide, her features twisted in pain, her body burned and raw. She is fleeing in the direction of the camera as running from a bombing in the conflict. To her side, additional kids are racing out of the bombed village of Trảng Bàng, against a background of thick fumes and military personnel.

This Global Impact from a Seminal Picture

Within hours the release in June 1972, this image—formally called "The Terror of War"—evolved into a pre-digital hit. Witnessed and discussed by countless people, it's widely attributed for motivating public opinion critical of the US war in Vietnam. An influential critic afterwards remarked that this profoundly lasting photograph featuring nine-year-old the girl in distress possibly did more to heighten popular disgust regarding the hostilities compared to lengthy broadcasts of broadcast atrocities. A renowned English documentarian who covered the fighting described it the most powerful photo from the so-called “The Television War”. A different seasoned combat photographer declared how the picture represents quite simply, one of the most important photographs in history, especially of the Vietnam war.

The Decades-Long Claim Followed by a New Claim

For 53 years, the image was credited to Huynh Cong “Nick” Út, a then-21-year-old local photojournalist employed by an international outlet in Saigon. But a controversial new investigation streaming on a streaming service claims that the iconic photograph—long considered as the pinnacle of photojournalism—might have been captured by a different man present that day in the village.

According to the documentary, The Terror of War may have been photographed by a stringer, who provided the images to the news agency. The claim, along with the documentary's subsequent research, originates with a man named Carl Robinson, who states how the dominant editor directed the staff to reassign the photograph's attribution from the stringer to Út, the one agency photographer there that day.

This Quest to find Answers

Robinson, currently elderly, contacted an investigator a few years ago, asking for help to identify the unnamed stringer. He stated how, if he could be found, he wished to give an apology. The investigator reflected on the freelance stringers he knew—comparing them to the stringers of today, who, like independent journalists during the war, are frequently marginalized. Their efforts is commonly questioned, and they work in far tougher circumstances. They lack insurance, no long-term security, they don’t have support, they often don’t have good equipment, and they remain extremely at risk when documenting in familiar settings.

The filmmaker asked: Imagine the experience to be the individual who made this iconic picture, if indeed he was not the author?” As a photographer, he thought, it must be extraordinarily painful. As a student of the craft, especially the vaunted combat images of Vietnam, it might be earth-shattering, perhaps legacy-altering. The hallowed legacy of the photograph within the diaspora meant that the creator who had family fled in that period was reluctant to pursue the film. He said, I hesitated to unsettle the accepted account that credited Nick the photograph. And I didn’t want to change the current understanding within a population that had long respected this achievement.”

The Investigation Progresses

But both the investigator and the director felt: it was worth posing the inquiry. As members of the press are going to hold everybody else responsible,” noted the journalist, it is essential that we can ask difficult questions of ourselves.”

The film documents the team while conducting their research, from testimonies from observers, to public appeals in present-day Saigon, to examining footage from related materials taken that day. Their search lead to an identity: a driver, employed by a news network that day who sometimes provided images to foreign agencies as a freelancer. In the film, a moved Nghệ, now also advanced in age based in California, states that he sold the image to the AP for a small fee and a copy, only to be troubled by not being acknowledged over many years.

This Response Followed by Further Investigation

The man comes across throughout the documentary, thoughtful and reflective, yet his account became controversial in the community of war photography. {Days before|Shortly prior to